While reading your article, I wondered if your issue is really with the IFP. They seem to try the 'big tent thing' with politics. Their 'migration expert' is a Dr Fisseha whose PhD thesis stated that 'climate refugee' should become a new category.
You bring up the price tag of his 'services' early on, and then denounce him as a quack wrt to the highly experimental injections. He could've made big bucks for less work by going along with it. So which is it? You cannot have it both ways.
He might have matured on abortion. I did. I was in college at the time of the referendum and got sucked in to 'Halappanavar-palaver'. I was young and bought the propaganda. That said, I've seen too much tragedy first hand to be a 'under no circumstances' guy.
I think the IFP has questions to answer about its policy. But my article is mostly just intended to inform people about this character's background, although I can write in a fairly irreverent style.
There are legitimate criticisms of Covid and what happened, but in my opinion he steered well away from normal discourse and dissent and went deep into the red with quackery and some of the conclusions he made.
I imagine you are quite young if you were in college during the time of the 2018 referendum. There's no comparison here with Gerry Waters. He was arguing tooth and nail for abortion for decades, and crafting mature arguments which showed he was not being sucked in by any media fever (which did not exist for abortion until around 2013).
He wrote what he wrote, and he took the actions he took. If people want to make excuses for him or ultimately find they can overlook it that's their own business. I try to let the facts speak for themselves.
While reading your article, I wondered if your issue is really with the IFP. They seem to try the 'big tent thing' with politics. Their 'migration expert' is a Dr Fisseha whose PhD thesis stated that 'climate refugee' should become a new category.
You bring up the price tag of his 'services' early on, and then denounce him as a quack wrt to the highly experimental injections. He could've made big bucks for less work by going along with it. So which is it? You cannot have it both ways.
He might have matured on abortion. I did. I was in college at the time of the referendum and got sucked in to 'Halappanavar-palaver'. I was young and bought the propaganda. That said, I've seen too much tragedy first hand to be a 'under no circumstances' guy.
He was right about the plandemic.
I think the IFP has questions to answer about its policy. But my article is mostly just intended to inform people about this character's background, although I can write in a fairly irreverent style.
There are legitimate criticisms of Covid and what happened, but in my opinion he steered well away from normal discourse and dissent and went deep into the red with quackery and some of the conclusions he made.
I imagine you are quite young if you were in college during the time of the 2018 referendum. There's no comparison here with Gerry Waters. He was arguing tooth and nail for abortion for decades, and crafting mature arguments which showed he was not being sucked in by any media fever (which did not exist for abortion until around 2013).
He wrote what he wrote, and he took the actions he took. If people want to make excuses for him or ultimately find they can overlook it that's their own business. I try to let the facts speak for themselves.
Great replacement.